Liz Truss, as Keir Starmer calls her “waiting opponents,” says she’s “fully committed” to the pension triple lock.politics NewsPipa

In a post-PMQ lobby briefing, a spokesperson for the prime minister said the decision to keep the government committed to the triple lock was made “jointly” this morning by Liz Truss and Prime Minister Jeremy Hunt.

A spokesperson said the decision reflected the “unique position” of pensioners who are unable to increase their income through work.

She and the prime minister discussed and agreed on the position the prime minister presented this morning.

In Downing Street after the PMQ, the Prime Minister’s spokesman effectively confirmed reports pending an investigation into allegations that Jason Stein was responsible for unauthorized and negative briefings. A spokesman said:

I’m not going to get into individual personnel issues, but the Prime Minister told her team that some of the kinds of briefings we saw were completely unacceptable about colleagues in parliament and had to stop. made very clear.

This news is clearly related to Sajid Javid’s decision not to take the opportunity to ask Liz Truss at PMQ. Javid was on her list of questions, but she gave up her right to ask. As mentioned earlier, Javid was the subject of a briefing from his 10th streak in The Sunday Times, stating that Truss thought he was “fucking.” (See 11:51 a.m.)

But ITV’s Robert Peston I don’t think it’s over with Stein’s suspension.

Liz Truss did enough to get her through the day. Sure it’s a low hurdle, but it wasn’t taken for granted. Anyone who watched her press conference on Friday said it was extraordinary because she made her U-turn so many times when she appeared weak and broken after answering just her four questions. You may have wondered how you were able to cope with the pressure. But today she sounded her confident and combative. Her dismal performance may have sparked an immediate leadership challenge, but she outperformed it, so she’s probably safe for the next few hours at least.

It helped that she had something to announce. New Prime Minister Jeremy Hunt signaled on Monday that the government is considering shelving the pension triple lock.No 10 confirmed this yesterday and James Cleverly used the same line only this morning. was (See 10:15 am.) The truss now confirms that the triple lock will be maintained. This meant that at least she was in the lead at one point, and Ian Blackford’s inability to understand what was being said allowed her to make a competent put-down and that helped make her PMQ look OK.

Of course, the triple lock announcement is the equivalent of another U-turn from yesterday. And I still don’t know if I cleared it in the hunt beforehand. But given the state of opinion within the party (and within the Conservative media), it was probably inevitable.

Prime Minister Truss has had to abandon almost all the policies he defended a week ago, and is now only backed by the Prime Minister, a Prime Minister who has completely lost his credibility. very effectively and asked much more concise questions than usual.

A book has been written about the tenure of prime ministers. It looks like it will be out by Christmas. Release date or title?

Last week, the prime minister stood there promising no spending cuts and everyone cheered. What’s the point of a prime minister whose promise doesn’t last a week?

Financial reliability – gone. And the ex-Prime Minister, who should have been her best friend, also left him. they are all gone. So why is she still here?

Sturmer didn’t leave the truss in a puddle on the floor. But the longer she stayed in her 10th place, the better for her raver, so Starmer was able to strategically get the ideal result.

Truss’ main reaction was to accuse the Labor Party of supporting militant trade unionism (which in the current situation is inequality) and to quote Peter Mandelson. She may have recalled a line Mandelson himself wrote to The Spectator two weeks before him.

Usually when politicians cite this line they are trying to make a Mandelson-related comparison. But it sounded like Truss was using it just because he couldn’t think of any other way to say he wouldn’t resign.

Perhaps she should have studied the context more closely. Mandelson used the phrase when he had already resigned as minister. And he rolled it out at the election count after he won. Truss looks like someone whose resignation is yet to come, and he’s celebrating nothing when the next election comes.